Integrity and escalation practice
Respond to conflicts, errors and suspected misconduct without premature accusation.
What you will learn
- Apply ethical judgement to unfamiliar scenarios.
- Explain a conclusion using relevant evidence and constraints.
- Compare your reasoning with structured answer guidance.
This untimed practice set develops ethical judgement. Write a brief reason before opening the guidance. These activities teach transferable reasoning and are not live assessment items.
Practice activities
You discover an error in analysis after a report has been shared. What should happen?
Review answer guidance
Assess materiality promptly, preserve the record, notify the accountable owner, issue a clear correction to recipients and explain which conclusions change.
A colleague may have copied work, but the evidence is incomplete. What should you record?
Review answer guidance
Record the observed similarity and source, preserve relevant material and refer it through the defined review process. Do not label the person dishonest before a fair investigation.
A gift arrives from a supplier during procurement. What is the defensible action?
Review answer guidance
Do not retain it privately. Disclose it under the gifts and conflicts policy, follow return or donation rules and remove yourself from the decision if impartiality could reasonably be questioned.